A lightly-sourced AP story almost set off World War III
responsiblestatecraft.org
responsiblestatecraft.org
If it is, as some officials have suggested, to throw the Russian army back across the pre-2014 borders, how exactly could that happen?
If militarily, that almost certainly means NATO-equipped and possibly trained Ukrainian forces attacking Russian forces located inside Russia on a regular basis.
How many ways are there to do this without triggering a nuclear escalation?
> Even after this news emerged, Podolyak maintained that NATO should enact a no-fly zone in Ukraine, which would likely require Western pilots to fight their Russian counterparts directly, putting four nuclear-armed nations at war. Kyiv continues to deny that it fired the missiles.
Then there's the question of what might drive Ukraine to exaggerate or plant evidence implicating Russia in attacks on NATO territory, or to hide evidence contracting that position. Hopefully, The Tonkin Gulf Incident, and the disgraceful way it justified an unjust war after whipping the American public into a bloodthirsty frenzy, is still on the radar.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2022/11/21/james-laport...
Essentially bend the truth so crazy warmongers don't force nato into a war when obviously it was just an accidental border excursion.
I don't think it was "gleeful" at all. It seems like NATO members were scrambling around to find any evidence that it was an accident.
Not only your point, but layer on the fact that by appearing to take it so seriously yet assessing thoroughly before taking actions, it heavily heavily dissuades any actual attack which would actually risk rapid escalation.
Except the other times it did. They should source their articles better.