I found most of this to be quite "objective" and not really related to design decisions.
Most of it very subtle, I agree, but I think it's hard to argue against any of the questions being subjective.
Most of it very subtle, I agree, but I think it's hard to argue against any of the questions being subjective.
Yeah, it looks nice, but so do nice clean rectangular edges. This test is missing context, in that sense it is pretty subjective.
Some of the alignment issued were fairly objective, many of them were not, e.g. some vertical alignment ones. Ofc you want consistent alignment, but you simply can't look at two images to figure out what is 'correct'. That's a design decision.
There were several where the text between the two appeared to be different, but resolved to the same during compare.
But you don't get to be a hard engineer without solving hard problems without any help. Just toughen up and study. :/s
Perhaps these claims are the result of A/B testing and measuring differential engagement. In which case: Cool! That we lowly internet addicts can guess or determine the most effective from design rules, aesthetic preferences, and stockholm syndrome (kidding, a little).
The solid camera icon is off-center (it looks smaller, mangled), but the hollow versions of the mic and camera effectively communicate if they are "on" or not and are sized correctly.