Not surprisingly, 7 of 8 are in California.
I'm more curious about the bottom 8 of the list, however; the cheapest cities in the US.
I'm more curious about the bottom 8 of the list, however; the cheapest cities in the US.
Apparently most states recognize a place as a city if it just has a few hundred residents/voters. There's plenty of abandoned houses (thus $0 homes) in places that fit these definitions.
[1] https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/GARM/Ch9GARM.pdf
What would be interesting (to me anyway) is a list of some cities who are disproportionately cheap related to their density.
The problem is, younger generations all want to move to the same handful of cities and wonder why pricing is so high in those cities.
Because that's where the jobs are?
Perhaps the real problem is that the jobs are concentrated in a handful of cities (and those cities also host a high concentration of NIMBYs who refuse to build more housing).