But is there a zone, at least internally, where such communication is safe?
I would imagine that a firm is incentivized to want to know where their team members are leaving gaps.
I would imagine that a firm is incentivized to want to know where their team members are leaving gaps.
The news article practically writes itself. "Despite repeated claims that all ice had been cleared, internal documents show multiple employees were aware that only 99% had been cleared. These emails show considerable concern about the remaining 1% of ice, but no further action was ever taken by the company to rectify the dangerous situation."