By the logic that says that UN is saying that the Internet is a human right, theft is a human right because I say that the death penalty for stealing $1 worth of stuff is too large of a punishment.
By the logic that says that UN is saying that the Internet is a human right, theft is a human right because I say that the death penalty for stealing $1 worth of stuff is too large of a punishment.
If I see a parent kick a child because the child was annoying the parent and say, "the punishment doesn't fit the crime," is your first reaction, "BUT THAT CHILD WASN'T CONVICTED IN A COURT OF LAW! DON'T CALL IT A CRIME! RETRACT THAT STATEMENT IMMEDIATELY! PARSE ERROR!"
Also, you seem to be mistaking that I agree with 3-strikes laws due to my comment. The point of my comment was that the parroting of "The UN thinks the Internet is a human right," is wrong. If the UN really thought that the Internet was a human right, then every country that didn't supply free Internet to its citizens would be guilty of 'human rights violations.'