In reality, the Koch brothers have an eclectic mixed bag of ideas, some of which are batshit crazy, some of which are good, most of which are meh.
Libertarianism in general seems to filter/select for people that insist mankind can’t possibly alter the climate and that it’s just a huge leftist plot.
It’s the primary try reason I stopped identifying with the concept.
Disappointing because there are a lot of good ideas / principles in the philosophy, but the degree of pedantic extremism exhibited by the community is weird.
I don't recall anything extreme or controversial. The gist was: gov regs too often have a winner and a loser. It all depends on who / what has the most influential on the legislature.
I guess that's controversial is that's what truth and honesty is.
Saying a system has faults and can he improved doesn't mean you are excluded from that system.