Paris mulls e-scooter ban in global test for micromobility industry
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
In the vision of autonomous vehicles is a built-in assumption that people won’t actually need to own one themselves and companies will provide “taxi service” for some fee thus eliminating the need for the end-user to actually own one as they can always call for a ride. How quickly will these vehicles become dirty, unusable, vandalized, or otherwise ruined because a subset of occupants don’t give a shit about stuff that doesn’t belong to them and there is no consequence for wrecking?
Scarcity does make people value their things because they’ve already invested in it and most people would rather not have to continue to fork over money to replace items that suffered a premature end due to user neglect or mistreatment.
All I could find were cheap toy scooters.
There is more going on here. Compare the condition of subways or buses in American cities, to those in Japan. In some cultures, collective property is rapidly vandalized and destroyed by the same people who rely on it. In other cultures, collective property is treated respectfully.
All the elegance of a bicycle is removed to make room for the indestructible design so as to be viable for public rental. And still they have flat tires, grimy chains, and shoddy brakes. They’re also so heavy, which makes commuting further than a few kilometers a slog unless they’re electric, and those are expensive.
I suspect that people are dissuaded from alternative transport for this reason of disrespect for common space and property. The metro is disgusting and sometimes dangerous, and the rental bikes aren’t a great alternative.
(And your fears are precisely why you'd expect corporations to run things like this: they'd respond to other customers' fears of "dirty, vandalized" taxis, and do what they can to avoid that image! You don't get that responsiveness from a commons).
I’m not actually totally sure what point I was trying to make, or if this will ever become a problem, just food for thought/discussion.
And in the meantime the scooters are dumped everywhere around town: on sidewalks, in cycle lanes, in the parks and forests, thrown into the lake at the north end of the town. It’s always extra dispiriting to find them discarded in the undergrowth out in the countryside - presumably at the very end of their range. One time I found a scooter that someone had either intentionally or accidentally left so that it fell over and smashed a ground floor window.
I’ve personally seen so many accidents and near-misses, including some too-young kids who must’ve hacked a scooter and crashed it into a parked car, a colleague who fell head-over the bars after a drinking binge and cut up his face, a friend who broke an arm, and a young woman who was walking across a plaza in town while reading her phone and tripped over a scooter that someone had just thrown down there and landed smack on her face.
Also the strange behavior of people riding who seem not to consider they’re bound by the rules of any other transport system - cars, bikes or walkers - and simply sail unconcernedly across junctions with red lights, or in the midst of walkers on the sidewalk.
I’d love to see them work better - I hate cars way more - but the anarchic spirit of their introduction hasn’t been the best for everyone living in the city.
I’d love to know where you live, because it sounds like Arcadia.
Where I live, at least, cars also ignore speed limits, don’t stop for pedestrians crossing, often cruise blithely through red lights, drive the wrong way on one-way streets…
For a while (when I was still cycling to the office) I was doing my best to film or photograph this type of behavior - which was difficult when it was over in a couple of seconds. I got quite a few films of cars driving on cycle lanes and the wrong direction, with the intention of somehow reporting it. But in the end I realized it was just a waste of time.
Anyways - at least I never find a car dumped in the forest. That’s something over scooters, I guess
https://google.com/search?q=abandoned+car+in+forest&tbm=isch
Anyway, my point wasn't that cars are sticklers for rules, but that to the extent they do, it's because the consequences of non compliance are potentially severe.
Drive on an escooter the wrong way with no lights at night through a red light, and hit a pedestrian? Get up and keep going.
That is only a problem with "gig economy" rentals. I think that is what I distaste, not the scooters. Hopefully the VC money will dry up soon before the rivers are filled to the brim with scooters.
I think Germans are more upset about how messy these things are than about the safety aspect. People just leave them wherever and occasionally some bored people do silly things with them like creating a huge pile of them or tossing them in canals, etc. They are not very stable and that means that even if they are parked properly, they can still fall over. Or people just kick them over. But mostly, stuff like this is a minor nuisance. Berlin is covered in graffiti; there's lots of vandalism, etc.. This just adds to that. I don't mind the chaos generally.
You also see people using them creatively. I regularly see people transporting furniture or even Christmas trees (last year) on these things for example. Or multiple people sharing a scooter. I find this hilarious. And there is a fair bit of abuse involving drunk people, kids doing stunts with them, etc.
But mostly, you just see people using them as intended. Berlin is a big place. You can walk for hours without leaving the inner city. Rush hour traffic is very congested and these things are perfect for getting around.
I kind of dislike using scooters myself; mostly because I don't like the lack of stability and danger level. But e-bikes are great and almost as easy to find. Most deadly accidents here in Berlin involve cars though. Stupidly and pointlessly large SUVs and trucks driven irresponsibly are usually involved. Right hand turns involving trucks crushing cyclists are very common here.
It's high time these so-called micro-mobility companies are held accountable for the abusive occupation of public space. Their business model is based on their ability to just go to a public area and dump a bunch of equipment on the ground. Street vendors are persecuted by municipal police for less eggregious occupations of public areas.
If locals have to pay for licenses to briefly occupy a couple of square meters of public areas to be able to do construction/renovation work, why are these companies allowed to throw around dozens of scooters at will?
Why not do the same with e-scooters? If they aren't properly out of the public right of way and secured they should be collected up and treated as abandoned. Eventually scooter rental companies will need to start charging people significant fees for not properly parking scooters when they are finished with them.
I'm in favor of people learning how to use e-scooters correctly because they are a great mode of transportation in cities. We've all just become so accustomed to the impacts of cars that we don't complain any more. (Pollution, noise, collisions, fatalities, space required for parking .. all far worse than any annoyances caused by scooters.)
Just like anything new people need time to adjust and learn how to have scooters exist sanely in a community.
Also for anyone who suggests to just move someone’s trash and take their spot. That is a sure fire way to get your car keyed or someone to take all of the snow and shovel it right on top of your car.
To your original point though, I disagree with have sanitation take the scooters as that puts the responsibility on the tax payers. In NYC they have an app where you can record an idling car/truck and if they do it for more than 3 minutes you get like 25% of the fine. IMO just doing something like that would make the scooter companies clean up their act pretty quick.
Where? In a car parking space? On the sidewalk? There is no "proper parking" for scooters because our cities aren't built for non-car individual transit. Hell, even the hip places in my city barely have bike racks. It's truly frustrating.
The only think lacking is better dedicated infrastructute for bicycles and e-scooters alike.
Scootering standards are rock bottom.
There are some fine details, like if you cause an accident while cycling, i think you could get points in your license if you have one, but I never heard of this happening anyway.
Being caught drunk driving an app-based e-scooter is as serious as any motor vehicle violation and will result in your car license being revoked.
Obviously all forms of transportation have risk, but the current environment where hardly any scooter riders wear helmets, and where they are used in tight urban areas competing with cars, cyclists and pedestrians, often with little clarity of where scooters should drive or right-of-way rules, is a recipe for high devastating accident rates.
other countries have scooter speed limits of 20mph aka 25kmh. that's a speedy bike ride already. for an untrained person it's hard to keep and maintain that speed on a flat and even road, by bike. I don't get how it can be allowed for scooters. and I don't get how scooters can be allowed to rent below 18.
There's also the common doubling-up of people, and you occasionally have to add taking selfies into the mix.
There's a lot of other options for shared mobility and they all seem way safer. I don't think that's universally true for a all cities, but certainly for Paris.
(Not a Parisian, but currently enjoying a week here)
i also regularly see people on monowheels, they seem totally mad
Moving the rider weight back would seem to lower the risk of going over the handlebars.
Although by that point you've basically got an evoke you can't pedal (which are illegal in Europe)
Is the whole idea that a scooter is cheaper because it has less structure and smaller wheels? Seems like a bad tradeoff, since it's a vehicle that can get you killed (I've seen this happen. The scooter rider got into an unrecoverable wobble, fell, and hit his head.)
For owners, I bet it's about folding the thing and carrying it indoors or in the subway.
Many jurisdictions distinguish between bicycles (unmotorized or with a speed-limited motor, possibly mandating pedal assistance) and motorcycles (can move at high speeds, fully unassisted).
Motorcycles are fast, but expensive and generally require licensing, registration, tax etc, and are generally banned from cycle lanes. Scooters offer the lack of exertion of a motorcycle with the convenience and low costs of a bicycle. For some that's worth the horrendous ride quality.
https://www.piaggio.com/en_EN/piaggio-world/news-piaggio/pia...
So while no scooter manufacturer would condone the generic use, "electric vespa" might get across what you mean?
Of course then you're stuck talking about Vespa vespas and non-Vespa vespas...
But your body mass is so high off the ground on a very small base, with VERY small wheels. Riding on a bird I hit a small pothole (it looked like a very slight puddle) and catapulted off onto the sidewalk. The physics are undeniable.
Personally I'd like to see the same model with bicycles, even if they are electric.
And for the love of public space: force all competing brands to share vehicles, drop-off zones and handlers.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/20/two-wheels-bad...
I was happy I did not relive it in my dreams last night.
Bike lanes help. In congested areas, we may end up with slow scooter/slow bicycle/low speed e-bike lanes with low speed limits. Anything faster needs a motorcycle license, turn signals, mirrors, and more rider protection.
I'd happily submit to training and licensing requirements for my bicycle if it means everyone else on the road with me, especially motorized vehicle operators, also have to go through the same process.
Since advanced education and licensing requirement work for German car drivers, it should work for e-scooter and e-bike riders too. And for that matter, it should also work for American/etc car drivers too. If drivers' ed and the licensing tests for car driving in America weren't such a farce, our roads would be much safer.
greetings from Nuremberg, BY ;-)
Seriously, one of the (seemingly) more popular "parking" spots for singular ones of these scooters I've found in my city is on an un-/dimly lit foot- and bicycle path at night, cosplaying as a tripping hazard.
Fuck these scooters and the dangerous morons who ride and just leave them everywhere.
There is no truck indeed, I might have been mistaken with something else, not sure.
You can still own one yourself, or rent one outside the centre and drive all the way through.
But it immediately stopped all the clutter. Now it's just rental bicycles — somehow, every tourist on a normal bike manages to lock it appropriately in a bike rack, but paint an e-bike Lime green and people just drop them wherever they feel like it.
I've happily used them in several cities already.
and I'm optimistic that we'll find more intelligent solutions to the rookie user problem than banning them for all others.