How to Measure Cohort Retention
lennysnewsletter.com
lennysnewsletter.com
One thing I learned from his class is that survival rates will naturally trend upward over time, which marketers erroneously attribute to (1) improving the product, (2) better customer service, (3) network effects / lock-in, etc.
However, if you have a heterogeneous customer base with latently better and worse customers, inevitably your worse customers will churn before your better customers, showing that “decrease” in churn.
These models also let you do cool things like conditional expectation: “if a customer has survived 13 months, what’s the probability they churn in the 14th?”
Here’s a paper of his from 2004: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=141...
If you count not "time-to-event" to "total-revenue-to-event" you get a lifetime value estimator!
Time-to-event ("survival") analysis has tools to deal with this, which are eerily underdiscussed. Here's one example: https://two-wrongs.com/survival-analysis-for-customer-retent...
Another common problem, especially when analysing what effect interventions have on retention, is ignoring selection bias. Most interventions are of the form where they will be preferentially offered to or accepted by users who are either more or less satisfied than the average. This will in turn make it seem like retention is positively or negatively affected by the intervention, when really it's just selecting for user groups that were different to start out with.
That is true for time-based (eg. monthly) subscriptions, but not for the general repeat customer case. (Home Depot or Starbucks would have no timely idea if I suddenly decided to boycott them, while Comcast would.)