Right. Which is a red herring in a discussion about legal sovereign immunity.
It's about consequences
Nobody thought they would go to war with SA
they don't have the balls to do it anymore
they did it with Afghanistan for something that Afghanistan did not do. You know, they are poor and have no army.
But most of all, business with SA will continue as usual
After the prince ordered the assassination of a journalist whose body was then shred to pieces with a bonesaw
That qualifies as OK to buy our fighter jets, no big deal
everything's fine...
Gheddafi in particular, he was killed like a rabid dog when was hiding in a hole in the ground and was harmless.
But I guess that if you buy enough billion in weapons from the US, you're fine.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kDWcjB2-OXA/maxresdefault.jpg
What both Saddam and Gheddafi together have done is peanuts compared to what SA has done in the middle east.
The US are becoming more and more a problem, they do not understand anymore that power means using it responsibly.
There are people all over the world banning the access to American cultural products to their children, must mean something.