Twitter just announced to employees via email is closing offices until next Mon
twitter.com
twitter.com
Verge reporter: "Story to be updated soon with more: Am hearing that several “critical” infra engineering teams at Twitter have completely resigned. “You cannot run Twitter without this team,” one current engineer tells me of one such group. Also, Twitter has shut off badge access to its offices."
It seems like a striking lack of empathy, based on my experience with - certainly not the same situation, much more gradual - but a company in decline where people are deciding whether to jump ship.
When a place is screwed up and mismanaged, anybody intelligent prepares as best they can. And you don't put any stock in what leadership says because they're running the place into the ground in the first place! This always results in repeatedly broken promises, even if not as dramatic as with Twitter.
Most importantly, you don't allow any emotion towards the company or upper management to come into play if you know what's good for you. Your responsibility is to yourself, your family, your friends, and any other individuals you may care about. Nothing is more important than a rational assessment of your options.
The whole cult of personality (believing or rejecting) is just irrelevant in a real situation, in my universe.
I won't guess at how many people will in fact take the deal, but I think psychologically he greased the skids by making it "opt out", while also making it very rational to leave now.
Several comments I've seen say they would not quit yet, as it makes sense to draw things out while finding another job.
I think that ignores that obviously you can't count on anything, so choosing to end the chaos asap seems attractive. And if you quit now, there might be safety in numbers. Better to be part of a mass layoff that you don't need to explain why you left.
I guess the key point I want to make is that people may be underestimating the value of ending one's association right now, because smart, rational people tend to dislike open ended uncertainty and know what they don't know.
It's unreasonable IMO to give people an ultimatum like this and not explain what either path will look like in practical, concrete terms. But the whole thing has been unreasonable so far.
"Elmo’s 5PM deadline was designed to make employees signal their type: High-effort employees can make big bonuses by staying; low-effort employees would be better off taking the severance rather than be fired for not meeting his standards.
But the deadline also put employees in an assurance game with each other, and ASSURANCE GAMES HAVE TWO EQUILIBRIA. In one, a critical mass commits. But in the other, everyone realizes that there is no point in committing since no one else is.
Game Theory 101."
I see some people in denial that he's feeding Twitter into a woodchipper, and other people willfully ignoring all his past activities where he did not destroy companies.
Occam's razor says he is trying to liquidate it, because that's what he is doing. The objection to that, I think, is really just "why would he incinerate billions of dollars". Sometimes, though, you have to accept what you are seeing, no matter how crazy, and figure out what it implies.
It was thought that the Van Allen radiation belts should be lethal to humans, and the ultimate test was for astronauts to pass through them and survive. But eventually, doubters of the Moon landings reasoned that since the belts are lethal, the landings must be fake. You sort of have to prioritize your beliefs, otherwise you come to wildly different conclusions.
A more reasonable, emotionally mature individual would've taken time to develop the appropriate metrics to determine which employees were necessary, and which weren't, vs starting with the galacticly stupid approach of keeping the programmers which have written the most code in the past N days, and then following that up by giving generally well-off, easily re-employable, capable engineers an ultimatum, with a three month severance chaser. Who do you suppose is most likely to click that "yes" button? People who are not as easily re-employable.
I wouldn't be surprised if twitter has less than 10% of their best engineers left, with the remaining engineers being the lowest performers. And now those 10%'s lives are all the more difficult, meaning the majority will likely be showing themselves the door in the near future.
Pure, unmitigated, incompetence on Elon's part.
Lots of moving parts to make that work. And it often takes a special person who’s been there long enough to know a peculiar infrastructure needed in part to make that happen.
You always hear about how these jobs pay a lot, well it’s not always the kinda sexy academic stuff you hear about on HN… A lot of spinning up and deploying services.
There are simple webapps, but as you scale up it completely changes.
Scale is not simple.
Except it isn't? Content filtering and ranking based on properties such as individual preferences and localized content is way harder than dumping a SELECT * FROM tweets, not to mention compliance requirements.
Of course, it is not clear to me that this will be the last upheaval, so have fun defining "dust settles"
That a pretty favorable reading of what happened, so much so that I’d argue it’s downright disingenuous. Telling people the have to agree to -working long days, nights, and weekends, all in-person, for the same salary or if they do nothing they will get 3 months severance and be let go isn’t “resigning in protest”.
The company (Elon) wanted to renegotiate terms of employment and the people that said “yeah, no” aren’t resigning in protest, they are leaving a (soon to be if it’s not already) toxic environment. It’s hard to call it resigning when the ceo gives an ultimatum like that.
I can't imagine a better way to legally fuck up a company as an engineer than to just stop keeping the lights on (and get paid over the holidays to do it!)
Not that that really changes anything, but it doesn't seem like new news.
And while I don't intend to defend it, many companies march individuals out without even letting them clean their desk out, for whatever reason, so doing it en masse seems more efficient and not fundamentally different.