I know it because they took control of our company in 2016. The reason in the decision: "inspector found no evidence of tax evasion, which is suspicious for a Turkish company, therefore we take control of the company." (not joking)
I know it because they took control of our company in 2016. The reason in the decision: "inspector found no evidence of tax evasion, which is suspicious for a Turkish company, therefore we take control of the company." (not joking)
Turkey can eliminate their trust based companies one by one if they deem it necessary, but for a government seemingly trying to focus on export the distrust would probably hurt more than it would yield. See DigiNotar and WoSign/StartCom.
The *google.com stuff is the more dangerous, but that can be detected pretty quickly if widely deployed - the intelligent way would be to only do so in very target situations and very, very rarely.
(Google added certificate pinning and other things to try to protect against this in the future)
The probabilities talk. 0.00001% this is happening in Europe (which would ended up with punishment for liable parties) vs. >50% this is happening in Turkey (punishment of journalists for exposing this etc).
So a rouge certificate for *.twitter.com can really ruin ordinary people life in Turkey. We are talking about a human life here.
But in the US the same thing can happen completely legally, via a National Security Letter, with no real oversight or appeal. And much of Europe is starting to follow the same path.