The do-gooder movement that shielded Sam Bankman-Fried from scrutiny

If the good deads of SBF shielded him from scrutiny, this implies that the crypto firms who did not do good deeds were scrutinized.

But it turns out that crypto is not seriously scrutinized; that crypto firms only receive negative press after they crash and burn.

Compare this to the heat Elon is taking. He paid with his own money and is firing a bunch of overpayed vest and rest deadbeats. Meanwhile, this thief stole billions of dollars from people (stupid people admittedly) but because he's on the good side of public opinion (go ahead and ask yourself why) there isn't a single article dragging this schmuck though the dirt.

He's not getting as much attention because he's only crypto famous. People who aren't into crypto havent heard of him before and we are pretty used to seeing headlines about these crypto investors scamming each other.

I have to agree. I don't think I had heard of him before this month.

His face is everywhere in SF! Seriously go look out of the window.

This is a good metaphor for all corporate woke culture.

Act virtuous and agree with everyone as a means of distracting from the real corporate misbehavior.

can anyone create an archive link?