That's exactly the kind of financial detail I like to see from a multi-billion dollar company.
Banks are insured against runs, that's kind of the definition and point of a bank in modern times.
Also, this supposed "theft" by an "ex employee" is obvious bullshit also. No way they made it possible for even the most compromised ex employee to keep the crypto keys, and if they had, they would have taken the money before FTX crashed. He's not dumb enough to believe that story, so the only possible explanation is that the thief is SBF himself.
It seems all $8B of deposits to this account were double credited to both FTX and Alameda
Indeed, from John J. Ray III’s declaration[0]:
> The Dotcom Silo Debtors may have significant liabilities to customers through the FTX.com platform. However, such liabilities are not reflected in the financial statements prepared by these companies while they were under the control of Mr. Bankman-Fried
And from SBF[1]:
> it looks like people wired $8b to Alameda and oh god we basically forgot about the stub accounts that corresponded to that and so it was never delivered to FTX
[0]: https://pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/33/188450/042020648...
[1]: https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23462333/sam-bankman-frie...
So, this case may be the first high-profile exercise in cryptocurrency-forensic-accounting. Let the paperclips fly.