Habits are not needs
seths.blog
seths.blog
They all have their hooks to keep you in as much as possible. You have to draw a personal line for each or even all if you want to make progress in other pursuits (even just other media forms). The time sink should only be done in small amounts unless you truly have nothing else you want to be doing.
Also to note I think is to be mindful of how these things make you feel after consuming/participating - if it just leaves you as tired as you started (or just from being seated for hours on end) or in other ways doesn't make you feel at least the same or better, it's probably not worth continuing.
Of course, tastes change over time as well. I can't game nearly as much as I used to in my childhood because 1)I know I have more fulfilling things to do (work, friends, hobbies) and 2)The sense of achievement finally started feeling fake for me, and I can't justify this "junk food" for my mind.
This is what happened to me as well.
Every now and then, I encounter some new slot-machine game that keeps me hooked for a few days (this time it was Torchlight 2), but the convenient thing is that it's the story that keeps me hooked most of all, so as soon as the story runs out (and thankfully nobody has created an infinite storyline with generative AI yet), the game boils down to numbers, which are predictable. Once I figure out the progression and realize how much time I'll waste just to get from X to Y, it stops being meaningful to me.
Maybe another day, but right now it just makes me feel bad afterwards like I ate too much pizza, so I uninstalled.
With AAA games if you're not using a subscription service then it's also a bit of a sunk cost situation - feeling guilty to play my backlog of purchased games because I've spent thousands on it over the years.
Then right below it, dude literally has: Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn buttons.
Where do you draw the line between a habit and a social need? You absolutely don't need to spend time on social media to be a successful professional, but it's one of the few ways to make explosive progress, and some people need it to maintain their status.
Another way to put is, why does Seth need to write things?
The latter can absolutely be incredibly beneficial, for the reasons you’ve mentioned.
For some people even social media is similar, because it's an essential tool for networking and getting business done. Terrifying, perhaps, but unfortunately true at this point.
Does one really need to watch the hit show of the season? Talk about with others to be seen as being in the “in crowd”?
Cancel Netflix/Hulu/Disney+/stream subscription and save money & reclaim time to do more meaningful things.
(No, it's a habit.)
Then again, not everybody needs to hear every single nugget of insight. Lots of nuggets of insight are banal to maybe 95% of the population, but super useful to the last 5%. 5% of 300 million people is 15 million people, which is nothing to sneeze at.
I learned a new word today — pleonasm — and this is a neat opportunity to use it in a sentence: There are people for whom their entire livelihood relies on producing pleonasms!
Yes, I can be successful personally without social media. Can I successfully launch and market a product without it though?
"You can be a successful professional without spending time on social media. See, look at [those people who've already made their audiences and can self-sustain, and then can afford to longer use social media, or those who made their audience before Facebook and Google completely gutted anything related to content on the web], they can do it! You just need to try harder!"
Spare me.