Hacker News Reader

I think we should question this, and give it a real test.

Let's see how Copilot does on code that wasn't in the training set.

No problem, right?

Sure, but based on your previous comments and overall stance on the matter, don't be surprised when most people have the opinion I expressed about your question.

Please, if you have an "artificial intelligence" that can write and understand code, I'm sure it can fix some tiny bugs in a little code that wasn't in the training set.

Why is this so contentious?

Surely the "AI" can withstand a little scrutiny.

How did you develop these tests?

> Why is this so contentious?

Please follow the discussion revolving copilot if you really have no clue.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com