The loss of happiness from not having music is just incalculable. But I would in a moment give up all my money and possessions to get back music.
Anyway, what they’re blaming on loud music is a consequence of genetics or infection.
The loss of happiness from not having music is just incalculable. But I would in a moment give up all my money and possessions to get back music.
Anyway, what they’re blaming on loud music is a consequence of genetics or infection.
I've had tinnitus for most of my life. I still go to loud venues and although it's rare for me to not use earplugs, I'm still aware of the gradual damage I'm causing from this.
I had Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSHL) recently and I'd liken it to an instant 50/60 years of hearing loss at my current level of deterioration.
I'm extremely lucky to have a doctor on the public health service who gave me an instant appointment prescribed the correct medication. I'd very likely would be near-deaf in one ear if I'd waited for private care.
Go and talk to older musicians who always wore hearing protection, and then go and talk to musicians of the same age who never did. You'll see the effects very clearly.
Edit: lift the noise floor in your print to mask undesirable signal path snr harmonics. This is the technique employed (very non exclusively in this example) by state of the art DACs such as in the CH 1.5 disc player.
This doesn't mean anything.
Hearing loss is directly correlated with listening to audio at high volumes. The amplitude and distance to the speaker is all that matters. It's well-established science.
Edit: just try swivelling your earbuds 90 degrees..
It's not a theory, there are numerous studies about this very subject!
Genuinely amazing how wrong you are about this.
and it's happened to me and to millions of other people
And this matters. Because if you have a limited window to enjoy your hearing, you shouldn’t be listening at 50db, you should turn it up and get the full immersive enjoyment while you are able.
There's hundreds of studies on this, it's absolute fact that noise causes damage, I can't believe you're trying to argue that it doesn't. And literally every study I've found controls for age because that's a super obvious confounding factor
How do you explain that noise studies on violinists found significantly worse hearing loss in the left ear (closer to where the violin is held) vs right ear?
Look at a violinist play, their neck is held at a 45 degree angle, compressing blood vessels going to… the left ear. If you do that 5 hours a day you might just get hearing loss.
See you’re oversimplifying a system with many layers of complexity. But if noise made you deaf and light made you blind, we would have many more deaf and blind people.