Hacker News Reader

Comment by xu_ituairo | Hacker News Reader

I think part of what people are upset about and pointing out is that these wages and operating expenses are far greater than they need to be, and have been inflating near exponentially.

Probably a huge amount of fat and bullshit jobs able to be cut without affecting the Wikipedia service at all.

View on HN

The point I'm making is that they don't know that. It's all armchair CEOs. They don't have the information that WMF has, they aren't privy to the problems WMF faces.

You think if WMF could run with half the expenses they have today but not lower income they'd just choose to run the way they do? I guarantee you they are looking at cost cutting daily, like every other corporation.

Do you think WMF are actively trying to cut their own salaries? Or to increase them?

> The point I'm making is that they don't know that.

We have a pretty strong indication though, since Wikipedia ran with significantly leaner staff not long ago, and Wikipedia wasn't fundamentally much less useful then compared to now.

If you look at the financial reports, in 2012[1] they paid almost exactly the same in internet hosting fees and other operating expenses as in 2022[2]. However the salary expenses ballooned to ~6.7x (adjusted for inflation).

[1]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/0/09/FINAL...

[2]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/2/26/Wikim...

> You think if WMF could run with half the expenses they have today but not lower income they'd just choose to run the way they do?

Their own leadership has said, in as many words, that "demonstrably we are able to run with far less expenses than we have".

Hell, they employ nearly 50 people just to coordinate some of the fundraising.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com