Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by orliesaurus | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

orliesaurus

I think this is a good idea for very small teams but for someone who has used and set up:

- Shared Gmail accounts

- Front App

- Zendesk

- Streak for Gmail

to handle customer support/customer success, I can tell you that Slack is probably not a tool that will allow you to scale!

Here's why.

When you do customer success, you usually have to have multiple people in the team handling a customer ticket.

You need to be able to quickly reference other tickets and run automation to be effective.

I use Slack daily and have used it since the early days: Searching for things on Slack sucks plainly. Threading is either you love it or you hate it. You want to flag a message to another person -so they can see it later, perhaps because they're in a different timezone GOOD LUCK.

A parallel could be this: imagine not having A/C and living in hot country like Texas... yeah not fun if you're trying to be productive now is it. (source: me, I tried. NOT FUN)

View on HN

Curious to hear – what would make Slack search work better for you?

My number one pain in the butt with Slack search is the fact that "advanced" operators or "advanced search" suck.

And I am not talking about the ui: there are multiple interfaces to filter/refine your search instead of being in a single localized page; additionally it would be better to be able to modify your search and view the results side by side, so that you immediately figure out if your new search params are better than the previous ones without having to go through a couple of clicks..

I am so surprised that no one has came up with better search in Slack in so many years, I could literally come up with a better search spec in less than a month - given search is something that is used AT LEAST once a day by people in our org

What's wrong with slack search? I generally can find what I am looking for?

It would be nice if it understood natural search. For example, “messages Dave sent to me privately last week including a URL”. But on the whole, it works well enough as is.

sure for simple searches but you can't do things as easy as:

> +term "exact term" in:#channel1,#channel2 filter:reaction1 OR +term2 "required term" in:#channel1,#channel2 filter:reaction1

another concrete example I just ran:

> "my-store" in:#general

is gonna return 3 correct results and then a bunch of gibberish although I specifically requested for the exact term "my-store"

To be fair the first one can't be done in one query but can be done in a handful of queries right?

Now I was never in a huge huge CX environment but internally we had a thing that was like Unthread and things were findable. Ultimately this was because people were serious about typing out things so you always had multiple axes to find things (and general policy of "write out the username to identify people" etc.)

Tools should help, but it's a combo of tools and a culture of regularity that really gets people to be performant and gets away from the "digging endlessly for that one convo" flow.

I live in Texas, my A/C broke twice last year. Worst two days out of the year, had to get a hotel room to deal with it until the maint staff fixed it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com