10 seconds of searching is where your argument falls apart, good luck with that.
Anyway you are justifying this destructive behavior with more destructive behavior? It's no wonder you don't take more time to understand these things.
Anyway you are justifying this destructive behavior with more destructive behavior? It's no wonder you don't take more time to understand these things.
The argument falls apart because two examples were quick to find? If all you can complain about is that it was too easy to find two examples to counteract the commenters clearly partisan and facetious claim then it sounds like you're grasping at straws.
Please enlighten us on how we should have spent more than 10 seconds to understand that there are actually no republican donors engaged in criminal activity and the commenter was just making a factual statement we obviously don't understand.