Hacker News Reader

Comment by pjmlp | Hacker News Reader

We might speak English but you will be signing everything in Portuguese.

And depending on the education we also speak Spanish, French, German and Italian, as the main learning paths in high school available to chose from.

But again, legal documents, Portuguese.

View on HN

> And depending on the education we also speak Spanish, French, German and Italian, as the main learning paths in high school available to chose from.

Come on now, how many people had any of these languages in high school speak it at a conversational level let alone for business. The vast majority of people i met who learned a foreign language in school (other than English) cant speak it.

Many do.

Myself I speak fluently six languages.

I am not sure in what circles you move, but the idea that "many" speak 4 or more languages is... not quit common.

The issue is probably what you personally consider fluently / be able to speak.

On average most educated continental Europeans speak three languages, their own, English and another European language, or local dialect.

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...

I specifically went to a European language focused school where learning a lot of languages was a thing people did (it was also classified as such as by the government). Six languages was the most anyone ever spoke, and that was a dude who spoke English, German and Chinese natively (lucky bastard). Even people who were good with languages did not go above 4 usually.

IMO you're misrepresenting to a huge degree the actual part of the population that is able to learn this many languages. Most young people in Europe can speak a native language and a second language, with a bit of a 3rd language thrown in. And that's only counting the richer part, many do not learn past a 2nd language if that.

BTW I count speak fluently == could have a dialogue with a native person about a random topic and be understood. Being able to ask for directions or talk about the food is not fluency, I can do that without language at all.

Yes, I specifically said myself, not everyone. I have worked professionally in all of them, when I said fluently I meant it.

The average as per EU statistics is three languages.

The person's country main language, english, local dialects or additional national languages in countries like Spain, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland and so forth.

Or in the case of European expats, the language of the country they happen to work on.

Why would a contract for an international deal not be in English?

Because legally, the contract has to be in the jurisdiction's official language

That’s not true - you can have a contract in any language in Germany. But the first thing that a court adjucating any dispute would do is have a certified translator translate it into German - at your cost. And that translation will be out of your control. So it makes sense to have a German contract, so at least you know what the contract says going to court.

correct - all our actual investment documents are in English.

Plus, if during the certification of the translation it comes up that the document does not comply with the legal requirements, it may lead to a contract invalidation. It can be really expensive depending on the matter of the dispute.

You can choose both the law and forum in many types of commercial agreements. Typically international contracts will choose English law as the governing law.

If your company has a legal representation in the English speaking country, sure, go for it.

Obviously not true for many countries. In Sweden we often use English even for domestic contracts. I've seen employment agreements in English between a Swedish company and a Swedish employee.

Because a dispute needs to be heard in a court, at which point precedent and/or statute need to be considered, and if the contract is in a different language to either of those two then interpreting all of them together becomes impossible.

Presumably because the contracting parties want the contract to be interpreted and enforced by the courts of a country in which they both do business.

It's not unusual, I think, for big international companies that already have assets and legal advisers in the UK to specify English law and English courts for a contract, but if a small Greek and a small Italian company were to have a contract in English, it would, I imagine, just make a legal dispute much more dififcult and expensive to resolve (whether or not the contract specifies English law and English courts: different problems in each case).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com