Hacker News Reader

> EA really has no bearing on the financial mechanisms that undid SBF.

It had bearing on the ethical/moral decisions he has been making. EA has allowed him to justify doing blatantly illegal acts.

View on HN

It’s more likely he tried to cover up massive Alameda losses due to all the usual reasons people turn to illegal acts: shame, myopia, gambling addiction. One core EA principle is integrity. If he was actually “EA”, this wouldn’t have happened the way it did.

That’s no true Scotsman.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com