Alameda, FTX Executives Are Said to Have Known FTX Was Using Customer Funds
wsj.com
wsj.com
I posted this comment in another thread, but some very good on-chain evidence that Alameda was posting a huge chunk of FTT that it received as part of the original FTT ICO back to FTX as collateral, and that SBF tweeted lies about that transaction at the end of September: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33568688
1. Shouldn’t the FTX.us president’s resignation have occurred back in Q2 when FTX customer money was allegedly being used to prop up Alameda? I don’t understand why whatever happened in Q2 was OK with him (unless he didn’t know about it, or course), but repaying FTX was a bridge too far for him.
2. As I read the thread you linked, it doesn’t seem like there was any on-chain indication of Alameda/FTX transactions in Q2? Still, really interesting theory and tantalizing evidence.
Edit: Ah, just saw another post below that SBF had a backdoor to obfuscate transfers between Alameda and FTX. That could explain #2.
https://twitter.com/autismcapital/status/1591459380742225922...
They said the "backdoor" allowed Bankman-Fried to execute commands that could alter the company's financial records without alerting other people, including external auditors. This set-up meant that the movement of the $10 billion in funds to Alameda did not trigger internal compliance or accounting red flags at FTX, they said.”
https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/exclusive-least-1...
The whole scheme has now entered the "whoopsie we got hacked" phase that inevitably concludes every crypto scam, in which the insiders are liquidating and laundering depositor's coins, and buying real estate in non-extradition countries.
>"The more Alameda lost, the more smarter people showed up to take their money, and the faster FTX had to shovel funds into the hole."
I am not following this. How exactly did "smarter firms" take Alameda's money by using FTX's exchange?
I doubt he's coming back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lewis_(British_businessman...
People don't even bother to stop for 5 minutes to ask if their conspiracy theories make sense even if everything in the theory is true.
He also assured everyone on Twitter that FTX US was fully solvent and then filed for bankruptcy hours later.
So under those circumstances surely everyone knew what everyone else was doing.
It was a bunch of 20 year olds living in an orgy penthouse in the bahamas doing drugs and scamming people out of money. It honestly sounds like a cult. Some of the leaked emails from SBF where he pushes drugs onto people for "performance" makes it absolutely sound like a cult.
Here's Caroline (Sam's girlfriend, and the person who was running Alameda Research, the fund that he was shoveling customer deposits into to prop up) talking about her amphetamine use: https://twitter.com/carolinecapital/status/13790363463003054...
>"A few notes on the balance sheet info that has been circulating recently: - that specific balance sheet is for a subset of our corporate entities, we have > $10b of assets that aren’t reflected there"
>Alameda CEO @carolinecapital's Dad, Glenn Ellison, is the Department Head of Economics at @MIT
Source: https://twitter.com/jagoecapital/status/1590751676105125888
Given that both SBF's parents are Professors at Stanford, this couple were very much ivory tower children.
It would really be something if Gary Gensler was part of the SEC probe looking into the FTX collapse.[3]
It's practically a Hollywood screenplay that almost writes itself.
1. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/15-s12-blockchain-and-money-fall...
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EH6vE97qIP4
3. https://thenewscrypto.com/sec-chairman-gensler-discusses-cry...
1. "Invest" (borrow/steal) large amount of money
2. Bet as a madman and obviously win big cause I'm such a hot shot
3. Repay every debt and take profit!
4. How could that have gone wrong?!?!!1
What's the difference?