>their (presumably profoundly ignorant)
>i find your contributions so far to the discussion of this paper profoundly disappointing
I'm not sure why you are so hostile, and why you think everyone except yourself is profoundly ignorant, but it's clear that you have some sort of world view where you're superior than anyone else you interact with. I doubt anything I say would convince you otherwise.
tl;dr: I found this conversation disappointing, too.
rather than being hostile, i have taken the time to explain in more detail the things you asked about in my previous comments because they were unclear to you
i am surprised that you have stooped to launching personal attacks on me in this comment, since so far i have criticized only your low-quality comments (and the original blog post) rather than any presumed personal attributes of yours
try to do better please
You've called me "profoundly ignorant" several times in this chain. How you can say this with a straight face is baffling.
i said that people who don't read long things are profoundly ignorant, at least within the sphere of book learning, though often not in other ways. that's not a personal attack on them, it's just an obviously true statement if the phrase 'book learning' refers to anything at all
you haven't said even once that you don't read long things, so there was no reason for me to even suspect that what i said applies to you, even if it were a personal attack (and, well, some people are sensitive about being ignorant because they're used to being criticized for it)