When you're living paycheck to paycheck, you can make an occasional mistake and be fine, but you're likely to be much more risk-averse.
It's easy to make movements when the outcome could only benefit you.
> If you're in America, you've got no such excuses. You're not going to die if your business fails. There are tons of businesses you can start with zero capital.
You talk like people don't have dependents or opportunity costs. If everyone living paycheck-to-paycheck followed your advice, I'm sure you'd have a lot of parents explaining to their kids that they're going to have to live out of the car for awhile, because some rando on the internet said they had nothing to lose.
What an astoundingly ignorant and out of touch thing to say. It's completely irrational for most people to buy a long shot chance at wealth with a much, much greater chance of winding up worse off and in poverty (or deeper in it).
Also, what you said is an excellent sales pitch for a scam real estate investment system.
False. Both sentences are true.
> what you said is an excellent sales pitch for a scam real estate investment system.
"X people say Y so Y is false" is fallacious.
> False.
No.
> Both sentences are true.
So? A set of true statements can be misleading and out of touch, for instance, through omission of other important truths. In this case, the omission is that "trying" has a cost and the outcome can be negative. If you're wealthy, those negatives can often be easily shrugged off; if you're not, the expected outcome of "trying" can make the attempt irrational.
> "X people say Y so Y is false" is fallacious.
You misunderstand. It pointing out the flaw in the pitch, because it can so often be used to sell lies.