Today, standard weeknight entertainment for high school boys is multi-player video games.
Yes, multi-player video games are still slightly carbon positive. But they're about a million times better than driving up and down main street. That's massive progress.
Next, what's the environmental and economic impact of a forest ranger? They're adding significant economic value to the economy and also hopefully doing significant good for the environment.
It's not a hard stretch to imagine that the economy of 2200 will consist mostly of holodeck's and forest rangers. It's very possible that GDP will be growing and the environment will be getting better in most ways. Just like the rivers and forests of North America are better than they were 80 years ago.
People still drive up and down too, and there are more people.
> the economy of 2200
The planet will be barely habitable, if at all.
The only thing video games have going for them is that they don't get you laid.
The average electric power consumption per capita more than doubled in the last 40 years, and keeps growing almost linearly.
What exactly have smartphones been replacing lately? Other than PC computers, which ironically also saw a comeback thanks to WFH?
You're probably seeing things only from your own tiny bubble, not from the global perspective.
Your bubble does not reflect the worldwide situation.