>You seem to overlook the fact that Europe became dependent on Russian Energy against the wishes of the US.
And you seem to overlook the fact that US has been continuously interfering in European politics to force Europe to stop using Russian energy against its interests. Now, US has finally accomplished that.
>You also seem to have selected an unrepresentative set of scare headlines.
The articles I linked are very much representative, and talk about large scale systemic problems Europe is experiencing due to lack of available energy.
>Gas prices are in fact plunging in Europe, and the winter is turning out to be unexpectedly mild.
Now there's an example of an unrepresentative headline. The context there was that gas prices dropped because there aren't enough LNG terminals in Europe to unload the gas. It's not for lack of demand. Thanks for once again confirming you don't understand the subject you're opining on.
>You also may not be aware that in the 1940’s Europe experienced war on their own territory. I am surprised you haven’t considered that they have their own reasons for wanting to disassociate themselves from Putin’s state.
That's a nonsensical statement. Creating tensions with Russia does not help Europe in any way. The way to avoid conflict is by creating economic ties and a mutually beneficial relationship. The only country that does not benefit from that is the US.
>They are either a vassal of the US, or they are not. Clearly, since they only do what the US wants when it suits them, there is no serious argument to be made that they are a vassal.
That's not how the real world works child.