I guess in an ideal world, the board removes him as CEO?
"I made the decision to significantly increase our investments. Unfortunately, this did not play out the way I expected."
So, keep him to downsize the company and replace him when it's time to start growing again?
I think their share price has taken strong corrections due to these decisions. I think that's an incentive for a board to take action?
(I'm purposefully ignoring the ouroborus that is Zuck's control of voting shares that protects him here.)