I saw this, read it, identified with it since I don't have a Facebook or twitter, and wanted to share it with others.

Paradox: By the logic of the article, does that mean I have committed the cardinal sin the article was condemning? I know PG probably doesn't sell data to people, but still, by encouraging sharing behavior, I feel like I am helping the social networks become more entrenched.

How does one easily spread an idea which is against people easily sharing their lives, and thus, their ideas?