Sam Bankman-Fried's $16B Fortune Is Eviscerated in Days
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
Instead of retaliating, he generously invested in their company. Then waited for years. And when the moment was right, he crushed their business overnight with a single tweet, then swooped in to buy what remained. Check and mate.
Do not pick a fight with a billionaire.
He never had $16,000,000,000. It's not $16,000,000,000 if you cannot exchange it without the market crashing.
Economists track money locked into different tiers of static assets as different money supply tiers. M0 is the money that gets used to buy your morning coffee, M4 is things like government bonds and housing. There are different tiers in between for things like your car, an assembly line, or a stock.
The reason the rampant money printing of the last decade didn’t effect inflation was due to the money being locked up in the low velocity tiers which have ballooned in size over the last decade. Any event which causes people to liquidate these assets such as war, supply disruption, energy crises, or disease moves inflation higher as the asset battery gets deployed to fight the crises.
Biggest historical example of this was the WW2 where all sides had to adopt measures to counter inflation.
Question: how do they know when money migrates between these tiers? E.g., some of my paycheck goes into an index fund; occasionally an index fund gets liquidated to buy a house, or to pay for a vacation. Is there some "trigger" at certain points that lets these tier estimates get updated, or is it just ad-hoc guessing?
The fed’s estimates can be found here. They should have links to the underlying methods.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/current/default.h...
The other big example is IPO's. Timed well, an IPO sees shares appreciate from their private valuation into a higher amount as they hit the public market.
But yes, once already public, when being sold to multiple buyers, typically you're correct, a sudden increase in supply while demand stays constant does result in prices dropping.
Can someone explain their positions? Like if they want to move along the risk-reward curve, why not just buy fewer bonds and more ETFs? Why enter VC/crypto/etc?
https://www.otpp.com/en-ca/investments/our-investments/teach...
(EDIT: 0.2% not 0.002%)
420M investment, 221B total (178 in TIP), 420/17800 = 0.0019
but math with percentages is hard and what I said was incorrect :) .19%
I think that still seems like a reasonable amount to put in based on risk guidance I've seen for individual investor portfolios, but is definitely much higher than what I implied with my original comment. Sorry!
They manage billions, their bc portfolio is a small part of their holdings but it’s been a bit money maker for them.
9.6% sounds pretty stellar to me. This is much better than many funds.
Calpers' 30 year return is 7.7% annualized.
That leaves SBF’s net worth at about $1 billion,
down from $15.6 billion heading into Tuesday. The
94% loss is the biggest one-day collapse ever
among billionaires tracked by Bloomberg.Binance to acquire FTX - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33520585 - Nov 2022 (550 comments)
He is one of those people. The article notes he was a Jane Street trader.
Though, I guess Wu is for the children, so SBF was unfortunately too old for their sage advice