So is denying climate change or the moon landings...
So is denying climate change or the moon landings...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theori...
Despite actual pictures taken recently...
What percentage you think makes an idea mainstream I will leave up to you...
mainstream : the ideas, attitudes, or activities that are regarded as normal or conventional; the dominant trend in opinion, fashion, or the arts.
So, no, 6% is not mainstream. Moon landing conspiracies are by no means a dominant trend anywhere aside from joke books and parody.
Ah yes, so I would assume that the WHO would conclusively say that the lab leak theory is incorrect then?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/06/09/who-sago-cov...
Oh... they say they are still investigating it and that the theory should be left on the table... but I guess the British Medical Journal would say it's total nonsense right?!
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1656
Hmm... Maybe not, they say it's plausible too. Presumably Nature just flat-out tells us that it's a total conspiracy theory though right?!
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01529-3
Ah, they stay on the fence and say that it's plausible.
So it's not exactly like denying the moon landings, as I haven't heard NASA saying "the moon landings might have been faked, but we can't prove either way" anytime recently.
That's what baffles me here: "We cannot conclusively say it's wrong" so it must be right. When did that become a popular mode of reasoning? I can only assume people are so desperate to believe they will swallow this rather than accept reality.
In reality nobody knows the origin for certain, but IMO you seem to fall for the fallacy you are describing but with the opposite premise - i.e. "We cannot conclusively say that the lab leak theory is right or wrong, thus it cannot possibly be a lab leak".
[1] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...