The confidence interval is a so-called random variable, which means, given it’s not significant, you actually can’t really interpret it
Descriptively, there is a trend, yes.
But it can not be interpreted in statistical (inferential) terms, I think.
Descriptively, there is a trend, yes.
But it can not be interpreted in statistical (inferential) terms, I think.
It can be interpreted in statistical terms. They could use the confidence interval instead to state that the study suggests infection reduces these adverse events by no more than half, nor increases their frequency by no more than triple.