How to Destroy Google
freakspot.net
freakspot.net
Not saying I’m participating, just saying the article doesn’t explain where to go post-Google.
I've been very happy with non-Google search, and all of their other services are convenient but not unique.
I have no particular issue with Google, although I certainly don't prefer them when given the option. ..and the option is ~always present.
This is like trying to destroy the ocean by pissing in it. Good luck!
I mean: I do not use GMail anymore, owning my own mail, I do dislike Alphabet services involution and business model, while I have to admit that respect of many others "big of IT" it offer back something valuable (just compare Google Maps with anything else as a personal navigation tools in car) I dot not consider a direct action against it as positive.
If we want Freedom we need to be free. Let's start having our data on our server instead of flood someone else with crap. Let's start owing our infra instead of focusing in cloning web(cr)apps others offer to the public, so let's say coming back to Usenet instead of creating Twitter/FB/Instagram clones, using mails locally without webmails and so on. Let's start rediscovering the LARGE superiority of desktop computing vs cloud+mobile crap.
THIS, done on scale and seriously would kill any GAFAM. Play like squatters does not.
I like to believe that about myself as well. But statistics say that we are probably both wrong.
On the other hand, I don't care at all whether YouTube and news sites remain "free". But of course they must do so, as they would not be viable businesses in a paid model (YouTube, and almost all news sites).
Case in point paying Apple many billions a year to be the default search engine. Who else can do that?
Google should list alternative search engines in their search results. They're the best in the world at search but haven't earned that right in perpetuity. Surely the world's information deserves a more middle ground (and privacy)
Google's business model requires providing free services, if you take advantage of what they willingly offer (which is not theft), and they choose to spend more money than they make, their current business model becomes untenable.
However I don't know what their business model would turn into if everyone did what the article suggested, and the article made no mention of that either.
In addition, I looked into the author's github commit history and one of their projects is aimed directly at stealing YouTube content.
An all-out war on Google's ad infrastructure may protect your privacy but how do you propose people actually get paid for the content you consume? Do they do it for free? For exposure? Sell subscriptions?