Meta is preparing large-scale layoffs this week
reuters.com
reuters.com
After the rate of posting cools down a bit (from not being on the front page), it can bubble back up.
https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented/blob/m...
You might also like to add the second chance pool to your pages to browse rather than just the front page. https://news.ycombinator.com/pool
I'm sure it depends on a few different factors (upvote, comments, possibly keywords). Mods can also pin or de-list stories as they see fit.
It also depends who does the flagging, more karma == more power. If one abuses the function I imagine mods can / will [silently] neuter the account to have less (or no) effect.
There was also an interesting story recently about hacking HN ranking. The author created a bunch of accounts and got stories delisted from the frontpage by having too many noob accounts give a story an upvote over a short time period, apparently this triggered an anti-spam mechanism.
At some point it seems like a waste of time with poor ROI. You can make a story go away, so what? It's not like it'd work indefinitely, if it became widely abused the mods will catch on and modify the system.
I think the goal of HN is to have fun and interesting conversations, and connect with people. Excessive manipulation would be harmful with no real upside.
Here's the link:
https://reverseengineeringtogether.wordpress.com/2022/10/18/...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33255477
Hehe, it got death by flagging. That's pretty funny.
Pretty sure this is not true.
The easiest way to 'manipulate' what's on the front page is to just send the mods an email about posts that could use a bit of a downward shove. Pre-announcements, dupes, etc regularly get tossed out. The front page would be all dupes and rage if that didn't happen.
As for the flagging, it's what I've seen claimed but don't know for sure. Thank you for the reality check, @pvg!
We still don’t know what high interest rates are going to do to businesses like Uber.
Pretty freaky if true
I could understand a title like "Meta is preparing layoffs this week", but not the one used by Reuters. Alternatively, the Reuters report could include details possibly contained in the original WSJ article. Or maybe "Meta is preparing to layoff thousands this week" as others have reported.
If it's only 2,000 and the workforce is 65,000 strong, that's 3.1% of the workforce. Is that large-scale?
Second, there's legal definition of Mass Layoff as per WARN act.
> at least 50 employees are laid off during a 30-day period, if the laid-off employees made up at least one third of the workforce
> 500 employees are laid off during a 30-day period, no matter how large the workforce;
> an entire work site is closed down and at least 50 employees are laid off during a 30-day period.
To be fair, I'm self taught so I don't have a great data structure background. I've still had a good career though.
2. The US produces 65,000 [1] CS graduates each year. This doesn't include immigration and people who go into tech having graduated with non-CS degrees.
The layoffs are significant in their local context but I wouldn't think they're large enough to perceptibly affect much on the ground for SWEs.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/03/us-computer-science-...