Hacker News Reader

Comment by endymi0n | Hacker News Reader

Looking back, I guess the main point of why the early internet was so special wasn‘t because of cool new communications technology, but because of the self selection. In order to use BBSes or the early Internet, by definition you had to be above average curious, smart, rich, young (late night dialup tarrifs) and/or based in academia, as well as having a volunteering/cooperating mindset.

We just managed to keep the others out for a miraculous decade by keeping entry barriers hard, costly and complex. Is that an ableist viewpoint? No clue, but it was a bliss for sure.

View on HN

I’m not sure if this comment is a jab at the unwashed masses but you did leave out another group, corporations. BBS Sysops, and people that were putting up web sites in the mid 90s weren’t doing it for money. It wasn’t until the cult of money got involved and turned the internet into a giant direct marketing platform that things began to get really bad.

I remember when corporations started showing up. They were mostly ignored. It wasn't until mainstream adoption outweighed the early adopter culture that things really started going downhill and combined with corporations accelerated.

Yeah, I guess it’s a bit of a chicken and egg thing but corporations brought centralized servers. Of course we’re discussing a topic on a centralized server now but PG is not making any money from it.

I'm trying to remember when and infer why things got so consumer-y. Replaying it in my mind, there was Slashdot, Reddit which were fine. I think Digg was a downstep. Even Facebook was great at the start.

If I had to pick one thing, I'd say it's about shallow consumption/interactions that kill the signal/noise. Like posting a picture/video with a caption, having it go viral with upvotes/reposts.

It happened right about the time of Canter and Siegel and the September that never ended.

That was for spam. I was thinking of regular user posts that are low quality in the way HN tries to avoid.

Of course that wouldn't have happened until there was a large general population on Usenet--and the dates do check out.

Eternal September was exactly that.

That's what I meant by the dates lining up--correlation via common cause.

Corporations showed up but it was all running over the NSF backbone so commercial use was suppressed, and "sysops" would e.g. immediately ban users for e-mail spam since they were worried about losing their upstream (and transitively back up to the backbone).

I can't find the Bills that were passed now to commercialize the Internet and get off of NSFnet but that was early in the Clinton-Gore administration.

Good point, I sometimes get caught in the "ah, the internet back then" fallacy but what really has driven it down in the mud was the entry of corporations, not the people involved.

The early internet still exists.

BBSes still exist. You can use them right now.

The early forums still exist, in some form or another. IRC is still there. A dedicated few keep gopher sites up and running.

Not everyone chose to leave them behind.

This isn't even a "all tens of us!" joke, there are tens of thousands of us.

$ telnet osuny.bell-labs.co 666 Trying 168.235.81.33... Connected to osuny.inri.net.

$ telnet bbs.iscabbs.com Trying 167.88.117.146... Connected to bbs.iscabbs.com.

Over 100 people logged into Particles yesterday.

It seems odd to mourn the death of a friend you no longer call, but who is still very much alive.

So very true. It is _us_ who changed and choose for the easy web experience. The cool, hard / exclusive part is still around.

Eternal September, etc.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com