Git as a janky Twitter replacement
github.com
github.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_(protocol)
Finger communities/hosting:
https://plan.cat/ (thank you gbrown for reminding me of this)
browsers that support finger (in addition to other protocols such as Gopher and Gemini):
finger://@happynetbox.com
finger://@plan.cat
Unfortunately finger.farm only has that feature available on its web mirror, but not on its native finger-protocol home page.
In addition to those, over time I have also bookmarked some individual profiles, like this one which is one of my favourites
finger://blast-rules@happynetbox.com
Oh and also, in case you want to check the weather around the world:
finger://@graph.no (web version: https://graph.no/ )
You can learn more about the protocol by reading RFC 1288, obviously that's not interactive at all though.
I 'member.
I made my .plan file an ASCII art video version of the famous shot from Terminator 2 of the terminator doing a death-defying motorcycle jump into the draught channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0pCE0N-EF0
The sysops politely emailed me, asking me to change it, citing bandwidth usage. It was about 800kb.
It's a super simple format, and does the job perfectly.
That’s a curious design choice. Care to share more details, like why not commit the content?
How do you deal with fixing typos?
That said, I hope it does; this is a great and fun project.
Done properly, one could create some packaged blog(+RSS reader) container, but the free hosting support isn't there. You could use GCP free instances, but setting up a domain name+TLS is a barrier, even for some technical folks.
The idea is neat, definitely a hack in the traditional sense.
It's oddly fulfilling.
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/11/02/hey-elon-let-me-help-you...
When is twatcoin going online? I need to make fast monies.
As a business Twitter was bloated and has stagnated over the past few years. I’m taking an optimistic view of where Twitter may go as a product/service.
Take a deep breath folks. We don’t need a half assed Twitter replacement.
Speaking as a person who has been generally well-disposed towards Elon Musk and like him also would describe myself as a left-leaning, centrist, free-speech absolutist, I think his behavior has been erratic lately. Perhaps his behavior has always been erratic, but it just never affected me personally.
Speaking as a resident of a country neighboring Russia, his amateur diplomacy from a few weeks ago does affect me, and in my view was literally dangerous. He pontificated from a place of profound ignorance at best and continued to double down even in the face of very smart domain experts and ordinary Ukrainians asking him - begging him - to please zip it. Then he acted aggrieved and hurt when his "peace proposal" was not received well.
I'm not sure what is being accomplished by the latest Twitter shenanigans, but I'm seeing the same behavior of his ignoring domain experts. For instance, moderation is a difficult social and technical problem irrespective of political view. Advertisers are not renewing their contracts with Twitter, not because of Musk's political views, but because they did not have confidence that their brands would not be tainted by association with unmoderated nastiness. Again, Musk attributed this to left-wing activists and not his own inability to reassure his business associates. He framed it as a free-speech issue when it is absolutely not. Then he threatened to "name and shame" the advertisers who declined to renew. He fired the domain experts who understand moderation, and so the institutional knowledge about it - arguably, what he bought when he bought Twitter - is gone, never to return.
So, I don't think Twitter will recover from that. Perhaps if I had not experienced his amateur diplomacy directly, I would just continue to think of Musk as a fellow who is very good at business and is possibly playing multi-dimensional chess. But I cannot unlearn what I have learned. His personal brand is permanently tarnished, for me.
"Speaking as a person who has been generally well-disposed towards Elon Musk and, like him, also would describe myself as..."
like as in "similar"
Although, I do suspect I would like Musk, personally. I like lots of people who would make absolutely terrible public figures and business decisions
Just to be clear; Elon put himself in that corner, no one forced him there.
Twitter as an announcement platform offers nothing approaching USD $40b in value. Other governments and organisations could follow the example of the EU and establish a Mastodon server.
Twitter as another "social media" cluster of coitus never really had a clear value proposition apart from 90% of its revenue coming from advertising.
As such, it is just another advertising delivery system.
There is something to this idea ... using git as a distributed (micro-)blogging/publishing system.
What's next? A revival of Gopher?
Would you? Seems straightforward to point to multiple pushRemotes and federate that way, much like what's possible for any other sort of Git repo.
It's great because it's the only platform like this where you have the ability to encrypt if you want to, but it is of course missing some features. The biggest being the ability to share posts and have a meta feed. There are also smaller annoyances that would not scale well, such as the fact that people cannot make personal room name aliases.
I still totally recommend it.