https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation seems like the envitable outcome of this system.
This behaves very differently for falsifiable vs. non-falsifiable information, but the end result is not something in which I'd place much stock either way.
Edit: to be clear, from Twitter's perspective, this is excellent, i.e. this is precisely what a revenue-motivated entity would want. It's the rest of the world that I'm concerned about.
What parent is suggesting is that only the subset of things which are agreed by two parties who, demonstrably, disagree on most things, are approved and noted.
You’re not going to get “a fetus becomes human life at 4.5 months” out of such a system