World’s largest exoskeleton mech suit inspires a new sport
tvpworld.com
tvpworld.com
They only did one real fight, but still 190k followers
Direct link
There will be a long period of growing pains.
With people inside the bots the amount of actual combat damage would be very limited. Probably why racing or robot skill-test courses make more sense.
That misrepresents the issue, though it was reported that way abroad. A couple points…
The law in question restricts how much foreign investment and ownership there can be in any given media company in Poland. 80% of media in Poland are foreign owned (the majority are in German hands). Imagine if Russia controlled 80% of American media. In Poland’s case, it is also struggling with its own status as a de facto vulnerable neocolonial possession, something Poles would rather not be, especially given their history the last couple of centuries. Indeed, a major cause of the weakening and fall of Poland in the 18th century was foreign meddling and the alliances made by warring political factions with foreign powers who played them off each other.
The media company that became a symbol of opposition to this law is TVN which is owned by the American company Discovery Inc. and notoriously pro-opposition and pro-status quo w.r.t. Poland’s status of subordination (the ruling party has no such corporate/foreign backing). So it’s not surprising that the American corporate media would mispresent the nature of this law to Americans in line with thosee corporate interests. The very notion that corporate and foreign media are free of the interests that own and fund them is rather amusing.
Mind you, the internet isn’t censored, so Poles are free to follow both the many domestic and foreign media outlets critical of the ruling party at their pleasure, and this is good. And with respect to state media, it is the state media and no pretense is made about it being otherwise. Whenever the ruling party changes, so does the management at TVP.
But then I remembered that there are, somehow, people who actually do believe that.
No they're literally fighting for survival against a genocidal invasion force...
I’d guess power sources? Small enough actuators? Or is it just really difficult for a human to control?
Excavators can do amazing things in the hands of a skilled operator. They have interchangeable tools and they come in a wide range of sizes. Maybe the small ones feel more like exoskeletons than the big ones. Some even have the operator in a standing position. The smallest Bobcat (technically a "loader" instead of an "excavator") is little more than a cage on wheels with one big arm: https://www.bobcat.com/na/en/equipment/loaders/skid-steer-lo...
I guess what you're really missing to make this feel like a scifi exoskeleton is two arms, more degrees of freedom per arm, a much more capable "hand", way more speed in all of the actuators, and a more 1:1 control style with some kind of touch sensitivity/force feedback. All of that would make these things way more expensive, complex, and most importantly, fragile. Durability and ease of maintenance is a huge consideration for practical work.
Last month I watched a guy in one of these accidentally smash his jackhammer attachment on a low overhang and sever the hydraulic hoses, spraying hydraulic fluid everywhere. I can only imagine that this kind of thing happens all the time. If that was a 20 DOF robot hand with touch sensors instead of a 1 DOF dumb jackhammer attachment, it could easily have been damaged beyond repair.
I read once about a Japanese exosuit powered by compressed air. The market they were targeting was elder care. Using compressed air meant you could assist/lift elderly people around water without worry.
Maybe when it's mass produced in the millions like cars it will be more affordable.
For paraplegic wheelchair users, for example, you need an exoskeleton that fully replaces the functions of the legs: structure, balance, movement. That's much more complicated and much bigger. And the tech isn't there for consumer use, we're just starting to get there with Atlas.
Beyond that you've got many wheelchair-binding disabilities that present unique challenges and require functionalities that are somewhere in between the two exos described above. A lot of wheelchair users who retain their ability to move their legs simply use braces to enhance their structural integrity and crutches for balance, but couldn't use a powered exoskeleton due to the injuries it might cause from sudden movements or ranges of motion that aren't adapted to their limitations.
National parks have transitioned from trying to attract people to the outdoors to now trying to minimise their impact on the environment, so I assume they'd be reluctant to upgrade non-accessible trails like that. Smaller parks might have smaller budgets.
Then add risks on steep or exposed trails. My father in law is in a wheelchair (MS) and bumps/scraps doorways in our house. Move that to a trail on a slope and it would be very dangerous.
Probably beyond the reach of current technology, and impractically expensive for the time being. But in the long run, I can imagine that the cost of giving every wheelchair user something like this might be cheaper than the cost of making buildings accessible. Most relevant for newly built cities I guess. Basically run the numbers on the cost of providing exoskeletons vs the cost of making everything ramp-accessible and providing accessible transport. The exoskeleton could sprint over to your house when you summoned it ;-) Possible disadvantage: shortage of exoskeletons during city festivals when everyone wants to go out and there are lots of out-of-town visitors?
Answer, not enough to be profitable.
In military, passive exoskeletons are more useful than powered ones. They are just fancy springs to rebalance and lighten the load on soldiers.
For medical purposes, exoskeletons are used for thousands of years. They are probably not what you'd call an exoskeleton, though. A basic example is a splint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3xtVxPWf6M&t=30s
Power loader project playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbncXbXlaNQdAcrYvZGGP...
1) How do you define what is a mech? Would a mech with something that rolls along the ground qualify? It seems like that's the quickest/easiest way to gain speed.
2) How can you protect the fans? A search of "monster truck kills spectators" finds a lot of incidents. I didn;t count.
I suppose appropriate rules could solve either of these, hopefully w/out bloodshed.
A wheeled, tracked, or flying vehicle of similar size, weight and cost is always superior. It's just a fundamentally inefficient way to go about building and locomoting a machine.
Still, love the idea the genre.
Since humans are built the way they are, this can’t actually be true right?
It’s basically impossible for nature to evolve wheeled locomotion, and we aren’t machines.
Are you suggesting we are optimal? We aren’t even very efficient or physically fast or powerful for an evolved natural being never mind a machine.
If we didn’t have the brains we have we’d be just another ape. A weak one at that.
That’s just one example.
Ain’t no birds going Mach 4.
Perhaps true. As a fun side note, Phillip Pullman imagines a way in the His Dark Materials series.
I’m suggesting we are extremely adaptive. We’re not fantastic at anything, but we can do basically everything.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=troy+hurt...
The market for this is Japan.
If he can make it happen there, then exoskeleton sports can potentially make it anywhere, no?
Who doesn’t love a little lite mecha action.
i think a true exoskeleton is something that accentuates our form to improve how we can physically do something.
i think alien(the movie) has a good image of a exoskeleton basically a fork truck in effect that can move things though.