Hacker News Reader

Comment by seanmcdirmid | Hacker News Reader

Often doesn’t the stock go back out as grants to employees? So rather than create new shares, diluting share value, they buy stock to then grant to employees, so the stock buyback is essentially taxed as personal income.

View on HN

Yes, it's a way for companies with massive profits to route them to their employees (read: executives), not their shareholders.

And manipulate the stock prices to look to perform better than it should.

They could just pay dividends, but then some argue those would be taxed at time where as buybacks are only if sold later at profit.

> manipulate the stock prices to look to perform better than it should

They're taking actions that raise the stock price. That hardly counts as manipulation. (It would count as manipulation if the buyback were conveniently timed to coincide with share-price incentives.)

The money used for the buyback makes the company worth less, so it should be neutral if the share price was accurate. It never is of course.

> money used for the buyback makes the company worth less, so it should be neutral if the share price was accurate

Assets decrease. But so does the share count. This tends to raise earnings per share while decreasing assets per share [1]. (Liquid assets, particularly [2].) Meanwhile, there are signaling and liquidity factors which raise the theoretical value of the company.

In summary, there is no rule that says a buyback should be share-price neutral. (The same for special dividends.)

[1] https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/does-stock-buyback-affect-pr...

[2] https://business.inquirer.net/238377/share-buybacks-affect-s...

Assets re-invested back into the company rather than through a stock buyback could have increased earnings/share also. Of course, you eventually run out of things to re-invest earnings into (that could lead to more earnings rather than being wasted), and have to decide whether to do a dividend or a stock buyback.

Dividends are taxed twice, as corporate income then as personal income to whoever they are granted to (at least to Americans, other countries have different tax rules).

A buy back is only taxed as personal income when granted to the employee.

What about the capital gains tax for the entity the company is buying the share from?

If it is like a 401K fund, the tax is deferred (it will be treated income rather than capital gains later). But they also wouldn't have had to charge tax right away for dividends (dividends are re-invested into the fund, and taxed as income later).

> doesn’t the stock go back out as grants to employees?

I'd be curious to see a study supporting this claim.

It’s definitely a common thing in publicly traded tech. Those stock grants have to come from somewhere, and simply creating new stock dilutes everyone shares. Though I’m not sure how often it happens.

> stock grants have to come from somewhere, and simply creating new stock dilutes everyone shares

This is how it works. It's why companies report an earnings per share on a fully-diluted basis.

It’s how it often works, but buybacks are an option to avoid diluting share price (issuing stock diluted share price, buying it back does the opposite, though should be neutral).

but debt taken out to fund buybacks is also a form of dilution

Reply on news.ycombinator.com