Hacker News Reader

Comment by galgalesh | Hacker News Reader

I don't think there is any reason for publishers to force users to download their software from the internet now that the Snap Store and Flathub exists.

I've had so many bad experiences with broken third party packages or worse, "installers".

View on HN

I just expunged the snap system entirely from my ubuntu. It feels much snapier without it. I've never tried flatpacks, my preference is to AppImages, they seem to perform much better than other systems I've tried.

I can think of a lot of reasons why publishers of privacy and security related software would want to direct distribute their software rather than relying on 3rd parties if it is avoidable.

There's also just as many reasons to not give Signal root on my PC by installing their .deb package.

No one is forcing you to use their deb

Signal is secure communications used not only by nerds but in situations in which privacy is a requirement for safety. In this singular case do you think its a greater security risk that someone may compromise signal and ergo your computer or that one or more of 97 different stores/repos with a multitude of different maintainers get attacked and used to first compromise your communications and then probably your computer as well?

Remember you are expecting the maintainer to not only be honest you are expecting them to secure his own machine as well.

I agree that policing a bunch of third party rebundling of apps is problematic but the entire idea of just giving up and letting user applications splat all over my system because that's how linux always has been doesn't work.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com