Nadia Boulanger
daily.redbullmusicacademy.com
daily.redbullmusicacademy.com
If you want to get into the story of Lili in WWI, you might find this 2012 music & gender studies thesis on her interesting: https://depot.library.wisc.edu/repository/fedora/1711.dl:W6F... .
Never strain to avoid the obvious.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_music_students_by_teac...
https://i.ibb.co/hsYjDcg/nadia.png (warning: large)
And of course, there are endless fascinating anecdotes from her pupils and colleagues. There's a video of Elliott Carter talking about how she used to sing and play through a Bach cantata every week with her students[1]. Charles Rosen, who served as a panelist together with her at a piano competition observed:
>Mlle. Boulanger did not, indeed, discuss the contestants, but she had ways of making her opinions known. When she was bored by a performance, she would compose canons. On a large piece of paper she had brought with her, she would rule several five-line staffs, and begin to invent some elaborate counterpoint. The implied comment was far more devastating than any words could have been.
There are a number of fantastic articles and videos throughout the site. Looking forward to digging through them.
They were doing wonderful, loving, work and it was a shame to see them go back in 2019.
That's a strange view I have never encountered before. In nature there's an infinite number of frequencies, and in the Western system of equal temperament, surely there are the 12 notes of the chromatic scale?
To think that sharps or flats are not really notes, but simply modulations of actual notes is... unusual? I wonder what she based this on, and who shared the same ideas... Is there a tradition that has historically taught this as well?
But you don't have to choose just one type of third or fifth etc. in a given piece of music (or part thereof). You can have a single melodic phrase that uses both the major and the minor third, but I think of these as two different `inflections' of the same degree of the scale, the third.
Likewise, you can have a chord that contains more than one version of the same degree of the scale. In the chord E7#9 (E, G#, B, D, F##) the G on the top is being described as F##, but what I hear is two different versions of the third (major and minor) simultaneously.
Blues music certainly thinks in this way. When a blues musician bends around on the third or fourth, it's all the one note, but `inflecting' or `embelishing' that note.
In the early 20th c. a more expansive, what we call "atonal," form of music arose that used the chromatic scale without any particular referent to a diatonic system. Some music analysts and teachers even started to replace note names with note indices to avoid diatonic confusion. Atonal composition became popular among avant-garde and film composers in the mid-20th century, and is still with us. The diatonic system, though, has proved quite tough to kill off.
Maybe, but the key arrangements on a piano sort of make the exact same point, don't they?
> One suspects that it was Nadia who took on one of the charity’s more unusual services, that of reviewing and correcting soldiers’ counterpoint and harmony exercises
Only in France.
> ones remembered Boulanger offering holistic advice: “Quincy,” she told him, “your music can never be more or less than you are as a human being.”
Wow. I thought a jazz guy said this as "if you want to be a better musician, try being a better person" but I couldn't find it anywhere. Anyone?