Solar farms in space might beam electricity to Earth
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
It seems a very bad idea to fire (up to) 2GW of (microwave?) energy from space down to Earth. I mean it sounds exactly like a weapon.
Is this a feasible weapon ? (Given that microwave "cannons" are developed and banned for anti-riot / protestors this seems feasible.
plus try stopping airplanes flying into it. Oh and birds. insects, pieces of paper. Heating up local atmosphere. Oh wow. there is a lot dumb about this. Must be a weapon program :-)
Wow ... thirty years. That's the engineering document equivalent of "if I say 5 million they will stop asking"
>>> political, legal, regulatory and environmental impacts ...
Wow. That's, that's all the impacts. At once.
>>> 5km
Yeah they need a 5km diameter antenna to receive the whole beam. It spreads out a bit ...
Ok this surprised me - a lot. And frankly it's the kicker. If you are going to go to the trouble of laying out twenty square kilometres of "antenna" then... just stop with the whole satellite business and go with, you know, 20km2 of solar panels. I mean you get power after the first 1km2. And you don't have to have a satellite launch.
Or "turn off the power if another satellite crosses below your beam." Starlink anyone? Yeah seriously this will fry every LEO satellite and the plan is to turn off the beams as they cut across. Turn off what is labelled "base load" electricity, for a whole nation.
Sorry your hospital will go dark for thirty seconds. And again. Oh again. And again.
Aaargh. I am channelling Adam Something at this point. Trains. We could put trains in the 20km2 as well.
Ok - more seriously thank you @timthorn for the paper - sorry for not taking it as seriously as I should. But thank you - worth the skim read.
Edit: clearly I am not a physicist but I am wondering what does a satellite that is designed to collect 3GW of power from the Sun constantly actually do with the power of it is going to "turn off" the beam. I mean, could you really turn all the mirrors and panels away from the sun and back again reliably? Or do you keep the power flowing and pour the beam elsewhere ? (which sounds like you are actually frying a slice of the earth as you aim away. and hitting those satellites in the way. Oh wow this is complicated.
The dumbest thing is that it can never be cost-competitive with surface-based power. It's a weed dream. One of the sensible things that Elon Musk has pointed out.
https://www.quora.com/Is-Elon-Musk-right-about-space-solar-p...
https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/r0yeu6/elon_musk_cal...
Solar/wind is already available around the world for cheap, everyone can have their own.
Or something.
(Really now, it's for Star Wars applications, isn't it?)