And of course all the points you are listing as weaknesses completely ignore the existing negative externalities (such as health impacts from emissions, tire wear and noise, economic dependence, and of course the long-term impact on the environment). So even if your pessimistic takes are correct, we need to compare them to the alternatives to get a sober judgement.
My major gripe is that a lot of people will be without a job once we fully transition to EV. They have few moving parts and so production lines requires way fewer people. The same goes for maintenance in the long run. In countries like Germany where a huge percent of the population works in the automotive industry directly or indirectly it will be a big deal IMHO. But as always with politicians they won't act until the problems hit their potential voters.
Or stop driving cars altogether? (I like this plan most)
Stopping individual traffic is a pipe dream. Climate change is happening, and we don't have a choice, nor will we be able to stop it - so we do what has always been the major advantage of our species: quick and rapid adaption. Accept that some land is lost, and move to places that are more habitable. Install air conditioning / heating where necessary. Change agriculture to focus on new produce that is more adapted to the climatical circumstances. And start working on a Plan(et) B, because we have only a few more hundred years.
Wow that seems like a generous figure. I’d guess fifty at best.
Unless you're out of fuel because the invader destroyed the infrastructure and has control over supplies?
(Here insert a joke about carrying Internet in buckets).