I just don't see any practical solution that doesn't involve some type of restriction on disinformation.
I just don't see any practical solution that doesn't involve some type of restriction on disinformation.
Critical thinking skills should be taught and practiced at all levels of education. An online course available for everyone for free would nice too.
> what are we supposed to do for the next 30 or 40 years
Everything else we've been doing. Calling out bullshit when we see it, explaining why it's wrong and how it's being used to manipulate people.
> What are we supposed to do when this disinformation education is corrupted by people who themselves have already fallen victim to disinformation because they haven't been educated properly?
Isn't this is a risk with teaching anything anywhere? The good news is that it'll be a lot easier for students to catch issues with how they're being educated when they can think for themselves and are trained in how to catch bad arguments.
Debate is how you get educated. Nothing else can suffice.
I guess I just don't understand why saying "[individual X] is a criminal" is restricted but I can say "everyone in [group Y] is a criminal" without repercussion. Why does the broadening of the statement make it allowable? It seems just as easy to disprove and just as damaging to society.
What are we supposed to when this disinformation censorship is corrupted by such people?