This is mainly media workers exploiting current events for traffic, even if their content is misleading. We really need to sort out media corruption and incompetence.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/search/?query=twitter+elon&fa...
Did a quick search of Elon + Twitter. Everything they reported seems factual and tied to things that actually happened? If Twitter does lay off a large amount of people will you admit that Washington Post probably had good sources or continue to be continually skeptical?
I think part of wanting a good media atmosphere is rewarding news sources that are shown to be reliable - and I would argue Washington Post is close to that.
This is basically what news is. The media "exploits" (reports on) current events, gets traffic and then pays its employees
How did people communicate before the invention of Twitter and employer provided email and slack channels?