You are equating supporting minorities in journalism to right-wing think tanks? In your view that's a completely cool and normal comparison to make?
Yes, you're right. I wouldn't react the same way. One of those is clearly better than the other.
Yes, you're right. I wouldn't react the same way. One of those is clearly better than the other.
Pretty much anybody outside California rejects it.
That seems way better to me than giving money to those hostile towards damn near every marginalized and underrepresented minority. Does it not seem that way to you?
It's not my fault (nor is it Wikimedia's) that this specific historically marginalized and oppressed group of people as a collective leans a certain... less confederate-flag-waving way.
Were they supposed to find a hypothetical centrist group of BIPOC journalists that will therefore then over-represent right-wing BIPOC population?