This is a misunderstanding of the problem. Once there is an API it can’t be changed without breaking the clients.
Therefore independent progress is no longer possible. This destroys innovation.
This is a misunderstanding of the problem. Once there is an API it can’t be changed without breaking the clients.
Therefore independent progress is no longer possible. This destroys innovation.
Because that's not the case, it's just a fallacy. Close or open API, they all have legacy users and the solution to the legacy users is the same. Obviously, if the competitor fails to update it's software for the updated API they will fail to acquire new clients and that would be the competitors problem.
No. Why would you think that?
That’s what forced means.
Competitors and api consumers would be able to argue that any change they didn’t like was anticompetitive and request injunctive relief. It would be up to the courts to decide each time.
Of course there wonʼt be a mandate on exact API endpoints or data structures for every kind of service anyone could possibly create. That would be an impossible undertaking even for a bureaucracy like the EU.