Why is it "his personal ideology" when he's one in charge, but simply "twitter's rules" when the previous CEOs were in charge?
The only reason its framed this way is since the comment I originally replied to disagrees with Musk. If he was coming in and doubling down on Twitter's choices it would suddenly stop being ideology.
Elon rolling in and being like, "Unban these people even though they've broken the rules" is clearly a different mode.
Presumably is doing some heavily lifting here. But either way, my point stands why isn't it "group ideology". Simply because it was made by committee doesn't change the connotation used.
If someone opposed to Musk's views later takes control of twitter and restores everything to the current status quo, will that also be done using "personaly ideology"?
If Elon sells to, I dunno, Zizek, and sudden changes occur, of course I'd say the new leftist leaders were enforcing their personal ideology.
Is it so hard to believe that someone can be a leftist and not also critical of the left? A dictator is a dictator, and it's bad, no matter their ideology.
Musk is a dictator now? Why does everybody have to be the next Hitler?
My friends, engineers at Twitter, are saying they received demands they work overnight to deliver features and changes last night.
He's absolutely a dictator within Twitter.