""" Earlier Thursday in Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters, product leaders showed Tesla engineers the company’s code, so they could assess and explain to Musk what the company needs, according to one of the people. """
Asking people whose work you trust to evaluate something you can't evaluate yourself is ridiculous now?
EDIT: however, it does leave a bit of a bad taste in Twitter employees mouths, in that it basically indicates that Musk doesn't trust them. Hmm, that's not optimal.
Being “nice” is not a goal.
I don't read it like that. The most anti-Musk people have likely already left. But with Peiter Zatko alleging serious security breaches, dysfunction, and cultural issues at Twitter, it's likely a good idea to get a few independent eyeballs on whatever problems there may be.
You can support Twitters past actions and disagree w/ Musk but does anyone dispute that he bought the platform because he thought their practices were unethical, and the internal culture has been openly hostile to his purchase.
Wow! You went from a 10 word tweet to "a flawed as fuck human"! I guess you've never said or written anything bad about another person given the angel that you are.
Oh btw, did you hear Musk won the case because the diver was trying to make some bucks off of an angry response, claiming it was "defamation"? Maybe not a "pedo-guy", whatever that means, but certainly a petty opportunist who received a nice basket of egg on his face.
>It added another degree of uncertainty to whether Mr. Musk would complete the deal, even though he had waived his rights to do due diligence on Twitter when he bought it. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/06/technology/elon-musk-twit...
As Matt Levine said, “Musk did not become the world’s richest person by always honoring the letter and spirit of his commitments.”