Amazon CEO violated labor laws with union remarks, federal agency alleges
cnbc.com
cnbc.com
That govt org has NO teeth. They should be able to bite a billion or 2 for gross violations, and disburse it to EVERY non-management employee and contractor in affiliation with Amazon.
But instead, it's a cost of doing business, and anti-union tactics lives on.
You aren't allowed to say that unions make work more bureaucratic?
Hm, it seems nothing has been debated so we don't know if and what's wrong specifically.
In another article:
>To resolve the complaint, Amazon can settle with the union or take the case before an administrative law judge in February.
The complaint:
> "interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed” in the National Labor Relations Act
The law:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/158
My take:
The fact the CEO said that bad things MAY come if employees joined a Union, suggests to me "bad things" is the planned action by Amazon.
References:
- Best practices for EMPLOYERS (See "T" for Threats): https://agworkforce.cals.cornell.edu/2019/10/23/what-employe...
Amazon CEO is shipping sound bites that make him sound like a victim. Poor aristocrat; he’ll have to wave his wrist and get the workers to automate the task.