You need a springboard for the logical leaps this article insinuates.
More like "It would be nice if..." and then a "oh sure, no problem. That makes sense to us too" than any sort of coercion or something called a scheme.
More like "It would be nice if..." and then a "oh sure, no problem. That makes sense to us too" than any sort of coercion or something called a scheme.
Right now I don't think that reaches the level of violating the first amendment, but I can understand that argument at least.
I think if we just completely brush away the conservative talking points, the people who consume it will just see us as dishonest and being unwilling to discuss what they think are issues.